Last time, we broke down the heat-transfer paths and the main formulas behind insulating glass. Now we’re going straight into the numbers: real test data, real calculations, and the selection rules you actually need.
I. What Engineering Calculations Tell Us About Insulating-Glass Performance
Calculation basis: the manufacturer measured the samples with a spectrophotometer and used spectral integration formulas to calculate the spectral constants for each pane.
Sample 1: clear glass (CSG 6mm clear glass)
| Tsol1 | Tsol2 | Rsol1 | Rsol2 | Tvis1 | Tvis2 | Rvis1 | Rvis2 | ε1 | ε2 |
| 0.822 | 0.822 | 0.074 | 0.074 | 0.897 | 0.897 | 0.081 | 0.081 | 0.84 | 0.84 |
Sample 2: Low-E glass (CSG LB69-1_6 double-silver coated glass)
| Tsol1 | Tsol2 | Rsol1 | Rsol2 | Tvis1 | Tvis2 | Rvis1 | Rvis2 | ε1 | ε2 |
| 0.325 | 0.325 | 0.301 | 0.419 | 0.669 | 0.669 | 0.091 | 0.053 | 0.84 | 0.033 |
Sample 3: solar control coated glass (CSG CNY129_6, added for a clearer comparison)
| Tsol1 | Tsol2 | Rsol1 | Rsol2 | Tvis1 | Tvis2 | Rvis1 | Rvis2 | ε1 | ε2 |
| 0.292 | 0.292 | 0.137 | 0.239 | 0.322 | 0.322 | 0.17 | 0.214 | 0.84 | 0.664 |
Calculated with LBNL Window 7.2 under the boundary conditions in JGJ/T 151:
- Tvis=0.603,g(SHGC)=0.363,SC=0.417,LSG=1.66,K(U)=1.66 W/㎡·K
- Low-E glass results:
Tvis=0.603,g(SHGC)=0.363,SC=0.417,LSG=1.66,K(U)=1.66 W/㎡·K - Tv=0.294,g(SHGC)=0.35,SC=0.403,K(U)=2.51 W/㎡·K,LSG=0.84
- After switching to solar control coated glass:
Tv=0.294,g(SHGC)=0.35,SC=0.403,K(U)=2.51 W/㎡·K,LSG=0.84
📊 What the comparison shows:
With similar SC values, the insulating-glass system using solar control coated glass has only about half the LSG of the Low-E system. Why? Low-E lets in much more visible light while reflecting more infrared. Solar control glass gets to a similar SC mostly by cutting visible light.
💡 Basically:
Same SC, very different result. Low-E has much higher visible-light transmittance(0.603 vs. 0.294)and a lower K(U). More daylight gets in, more infrared gets kicked back out. Overall, Low-E wins.
Single-Variable Trend Check:
Change one variable, freeze everything else – that’s the cleanest way to see how much each parameter actually moves thermal performance.
① Change coated-glass emissivity(0.02-0.25)
When emissivity goes up, K(U) goes up too:
- ε=0.02时,K(U)=2.11
- At ε=0.02, K(U)=2.11
- ε=0.15时,K(U)=2.39
- At ε=0.15, K(U)=2.39
- ε=0.25时,K(U)=2.53
At ε=0.25, K(U)=2.53
*(Note: these chart values are assumed parameters used only to isolate the effect of emissivity on K(U). In a real project, emissivity would not change by itself while every other glass parameter stays fixed.)*
② Change the gas-gap thickness
As the gap gets thicker, air convection drops and K(U) falls. Once the gap reaches 12mm<d<16mm, the cavity flow moves from laminar toward transitional flow. Go thicker than that and K(U) barely improves. In practice, 12mm is the sweet spot and the common engineering choice.
| D(mm) | 6 | 9 | 12 | 15 | 18 | 21 | 24 | 27 |
| K(U) | 2.32 | 1.86 | 1.66 | 1.69 | 1.74 | 1.771 | 1.80 | 1.80 |
③ Change the fill gas:
Lower gas thermal conductivity = lower K(U).
- 干空气:K(U) = 1.66
- Dry air: K(U) = 1.66
- 纯氩气:K(U) = 1.36
- Pure argon: K(U) = 1.36
- 纯氪气:K(U) = 1.26
- Pure krypton: K(U) = 1.26
Bottom line: coated-glass emissivity, gas-gap thickness, and gas composition all work together to set the system’s thermal performance – its K(U) value.
💡 Basically:
Three clean takeaways: 1. lower coating emissivity = lower K(U); 2. 12mm is the best-value gas gap, because going thicker changes the flow regime and stops giving meaningful K(U) gains; 3. a lower-conductivity inert gas can push K(U) down even further.
VII. Comparing Three Low-E Glass Options by Spectral Performance
All three glass options are from CSG.
Spectral data:
| 玻璃 Glass | 太阳光参数(Solar) Solar Parameters(Solar) | 可见光(Visible) Visible Light(Visible) | 辐射率(ε) Emissivity(ε) | 备注 Notes | |||||||
| Tsol1 | Tsol2 | Rsol1 | Rsol2 | Tvis1 | Tvis2 | Rvis1 | Rvis2 | ε1 | ε2 | ||
| SJ50s-6 | 0.228 | 0.228 | 0.481 | 0.491 | 0.583 | 0.583 | 0.083 | 0.030 | 0.84 | 0.024 | 三银 Triple-silver |
| LB69-6 | 0.345 | 0.345 | 0.392 | 0.424 | 0.679 | 0.679 | 0.099 | 0.060 | 0.84 | 0.033 | 双银 Double-silver |
| CEB14-60 | 0.434 | 0.434 | 0.179 | 0.223 | 0.624 | 0.624 | 0.103 | 0.032 | 0.84 | 0.141 | 单银 Single-silver |
The system uses 6Low-E+12A(air)+6C and is installed at 90° to the vertical plane. Here are the calculated optical results for the three coated-glass options:
| 玻璃 Glass | Tv | Asol | g(SHGC) | SC | LSG |
| SJ50s-6 | 0.524 | 0.318 | 0.260 | 0.3 | 2.02 |
| LB69-6 | 0.612 | 0.295 | 0.373 | 0.43 | 1.64 |
| CEB14-60 | 0.561 | 0.428 | 0.459 | 0.53 | 1.22 |
All three insulating-glass systems sit in the medium visible-light-transmittance range. Solar blocking ranks: triple-silver > double-silver > single-silver. Triple-silver has the lowest surface emissivity and the strongest reflection in the near-infrared range(780nm-2500nm), with double-silver next. At the same time, it lets more visible light through, which gives it the best LSG.
📊 Summer Relative Heat Gain(RHG)at a Glance:
| 玻璃类型 Glass Type | SJ50s-6 | LB69-6 | CEB14-60 |
| 相对得热RHG Relative Heat Gain RHG | 201 W/㎡ | 284 W/㎡ | 348W/㎡ |
RHG gives a quick read on overall summer heat-control performance. Once U value and SC are set, the option with higher visible-light transmittance gives you the better combo of daylight + insulation.
💡 Basically:
All three are medium-transmittance glass, but triple-silver has the lowest emissivity and strongest near-infrared reflection. That gives it the best LSG and the lowest RHG. More daylight, less solar heat, lower cooling demand.
VIII. Quick Selection Guide for Insulating Glass
- Go for lower-emissivity coated glass
This makes a big difference to the whole system. It cuts mid- and far-infrared heat transfer, helping lower K(U), and it also reflects near-infrared solar energy, reducing total solar transmission. - Gas gap + gas type:
From the data above, 12mm is the preferred gap. Argon gives the best cost/performance, while xenon gives the best performance. The final thermal metric is K(U). - Balance total solar transmittance with visible-light transmittance(Tv):
Solar energy is mainly visible light + near-infrared. Visible light makes up 44% of the solar-spectrum energy. As a rule of thumb, south-facing windows in southern regions can use Low-E glass with 45-60% Tv. Shaded sides can use high-transmittance Low-E to keep daylight up. Where there is no direct sun, incoming energy is mainly far-infrared, so solar transmittance is not the right insulation metric. And yes: solar control coated glass on a shaded façade does basically nothing for thermal insulation. - Near-Infrared Blocking:
Near-infrared is 53% of solar-radiation energy. For summer heat control in southern regions, you want as little of it indoors as possible. Zero is unrealistic, so lower-emissivity glass is the better way to boost near-infrared blocking. - Core Metric: LSG
Total solar transmittance sets how much solar heat the insulating-glass system gains. Lower g is better for heat control, but push g too low and you can kill visible light too. So first meet the daylight requirement, then go for the lowest practical g.
Use LSG to optimize the pick: if Tv is fixed – for example 55% – then LSG=Tv/g=0.55/g. Same numerator, so the higher the LSG, the less solar energy gets indoors.
💡 Basically:
Quick selection checklist:
- Pick low-emissivity coated glass to lower both K(U) and solar transmission.
- Use a 12mm gas gap. Argon is the best value; xenon gives the best performance.
- Sun-facing side: Low-E with Tv 45-60%. Shaded side: high-transmittance Low-E. Don’t use solar control coated glass on a shaded side – it won’t give you meaningful insulation.
- For thermal optimization, check LSG. With Tv fixed, higher LSG = less solar energy indoors.
*Reference standards: JGJ/T151, GB/T2680, ISO15099, etc.*



